The challenge
A recent engagement involved years of participant and program data spread across multiple systems. Historical demographics, inconsistent records, and competing sources made reliable reporting difficult.
The work
The process mapped systems and fields, reconciled and deduplicated records, integrated historical demographics, and validated the resulting reporting structure. Decisions about comparable fields and appropriate architecture mattered as much as the technical work.
What changed
- 38,739 records in the master roster.
- 14,636 historical records enriched.
- Zero duplicate emails after the audit.
These figures describe data preparation results from the supplied engagement summary. They are not measures of participant outcomes or evidence of program effectiveness.
Why it matters
A dependable reporting foundation makes it easier to ask useful questions about participation and outcomes. It also makes data limitations easier to see and address.
Explore Data Consolidation ↗